commentary Windows 7 will be one of Microsoft's greatest operating systems, if it fulfils the promise shown by the unofficial beta version (build 7000) we have been testing for the past couple of days.
(Credit: Renai LeMay/ZDNet.com.au)
Let me preface these quick impressions of Redmond's latest opus by saying that I came to Windows 7 after having happily run the much-maligned Windows Vista on my Intel Core 2 Duo-based PC for the past 18 months (alongside Ubuntu).
I found Vista to be a worthy upgrade from Windows XP SP2. Despite its obvious flaws (can you say "resource hog"?) and acknowledging that some of its features need to be disabled by default, Vista at heart is a much more stable and usable operating system than XP, which was first released back in 2001.
The release of Service Pack 1 and gradual driver improvements have built on Microsoft's somewhat shaky Vista beginning.
Coming from this background, I have been pleased to discover over the past several days that Microsoft appears to have built on Vista's strengths and addressed most of its weaknesses with the beta release of Windows 7.
Windows 7 beta was a painless install. Out of the box driver support on our test machine was perfect, and it only took half an hour and two quick reboots to begin running a stable desktop environment, although we wondered why Windows 7 created a 200MB partition in addition to its main partition. The 33MB of updates quickly came down the pipe upon loading the desktop.
Basic desktop performance was strong; the reports that Windows 7 is simply faster than Vista appear to be true. Certainly Windows 7 had no problem simultaneously installing and launching applications, downloading files, web browsing and carrying out other tasks on our modest 2.8GHz Pentium 4, which only has an 80GB IDE hard disk and 512MB of RAM.
Vista's most visible annoyance, User Account Control, has been pared right back on its default setting, and we only encountered it a couple of times throughout a whole morning of installing applications. However, if you feel nostalgic for UAC's old behaviour, you can easily change it back via Windows 7's new Action Center, which now centralises all of the security, update and warning alerts that Windows throws your way.
Windows 7 recommended we install a third-party antivirus package (it suggested Kaspersky and AVG), but its anti-spyware package Defender comes pre-installed. Microsoft appears to have an antivirus package installed under the hood; when downloading new software with Firefox we were told that our downloads were being scanned for viruses.
(Credit: Renai LeMay/ZDNet.com.au)
I particularly like the new photo-realistic device icons, and the overhaul of the way Windows handles and ejects USB storage devices. Microsoft appears to have wiped out a lot of the Windows XP-era interface quirks of Vista; the result is a much more simplistic, unified experience for common tasks.
I also enjoyed the overhaul of the Windows taskbar, especially the slick graphics, but a bug prevented us from being able to use the preview function (it showed a black rectangle instead), and you'll want to play with the taskbar settings to get this piece of the Windows 7 puzzle just right. It's easy to get minimised windows mixed up with launcher buttons, for example.
I want to stress that we didn't test Windows 7 beta exhaustively, and business users will need to closely examine deployment software and how the operating system integrates into their existing environments, as well as its ability to work well with third-party software. For example, we couldn't get Adobe CS3 to install on Windows 7 beta; the installer told us we needed to quit Internet Explorer first.
But perhaps the most important thing to note about the software is that at first glance it has much more of that nebulous "Windows XP feel" than Vista ever did. Even on our modest machine, Windows 7 didn't thrash the hard disk or feel unresponsive, except when we were installing Apple's iTunes, a notorious pain on Windows systems.
In general, this signals that Microsoft has spent a lot of effort with Windows 7 on delivering a solid operating system that won't "wow" anyone, but will satisfy them on a much deeper level. In other words, just what the doctor, and the customers, ordered.
You can find a lot of further Windows 7 analysis on the ZDNet.com blog of Adrian Kingsley-Hughes, as well as our own photo gallery here.
What do you think about Windows 7 so far? Love it or hate it? Are you still using Windows XP, or have you switched to a Mac or Linux?
Do you need help with Windows? 
1
bbneo - 12/01/09
The fanboys feed the fizzle...
You must have one of the three Vista machines that is 18 months old and that has been usable for a major portion of that time. Congratulations. You are an anomaly.
It's time to close the door on the Microsoft's empty promises and money grabs. Try something new.
Linux. Mac. Anything else other than Microsoft.
» Report offensive content
2
bbneo - 12/01/09
Microsoft is the GM of the operating system industry... each dud is supposed to be better than the last.
» Report offensive content
3
bbneo - 12/01/09
Photorealistic? You mean they look like sh*t?!?
» Report offensive content
4
Paul - 13/01/09
"In general, this signals that Microsoft has spent a lot of effort with Windows 7 on delivering a solid operating system that won't "wow" anyone, but will satisfy them on a much deeper level."
My thoughts exactly. There's no major programming overhaul here (although the auto-driver thingy is pretty nice) but Windows 7 is fairly user friendly and runs well.
Bbneo- bash Microsoft all you want. Truth- 90% of all computers have a Windows OS on it. They've got to be doing something that the people like.
Besides, I don't like Linux because the driver and game support run entirely on a volunteer basis. I don't like Mac's because, again, the driver and game support for them is barely adequete when compared to a Windows OS. That said, Macs have been making great improvements in the past year and if they keep it up then I might take a look
» Report offensive content
5
OMA - 17/01/09
"They've got to be doing something that the people like"
Not necessarily. The huge majority of people doesn't care about what's their operating system. They just expect that when they buy a computer, it works. They use Windows because that's what 90% of the computers come bundled with, in the same way 90% of the people use Internet Explorer, despite being the worst of the worst browsers available, just because they don't know any better.
I've tested Windows 7 and I agree it works good even in an old single core computer, something that can't be said about Vista. That means Microsoft sold a notoriously flawed and unoptimized operating system back in 2006, but at a price like if it was a great OS. Now we may have a decent operating system, but meanwhile, they've always been selling beta-quality software like that.
» Report offensive content
6
Ruth - 31/03/09
I would like to recommend to everyone.
Search-and-destroy Antispyware is an excellent scanner that I would like to recommend to everyone. I simply love it. In the past I have tried many different types of scans. Some of them were free and others cost quite a bit of money but they all seem to pick up the same types of bugs. The antispyware solution from Search-and-destroy is less expensive than most and it will clean your computer and keep it working great just like the more costly scanners. Click on http://www.Search-and-destroy.com to learn more about this scan and how it can help you protect your computer.
» Report offensive content