Report offensive comment
Wesley Parish - 2007/04/28 17:59:23
By clicking on the Submit button, you have deemed the user comment above as abusive or offensive. The message will be flagged and our editors will be alerted.
If you wish to be contacted, please complete the form below. Your details will be kept confidential.
News and features
- Latest
- Popular
- Features
- Most Discussed
-
XP stays on life support for longerThis week's Roundup looks at Microsoft's decision to extend the life of Windows XP, the release of Microsoft Surface SDK, Firefox's new Geode plug-in, Yahoo's new tool -- Smush It and more. Read more »
-
The good and truly awful celluloid depictions of computersEver wonder why your lawyer uncle leaves the room whenever you turn over to Boston Legal? Or why your forensic science cousin can't stand crime drama? You know the answer: it’s the horrid trivialisation and dumbing down of an occupation to make it appear entertaining. Sometimes it is so unbelievable that it actually hurts and yelling at the screen is the only outlet. Read more »
-
Apple's iPhone engineers to tour Sydney, MelbourneAussie developers will be able to get up close and personal with some of the iPhone engineers in November to learn how to build applications for the platform. Read more »
-
Five services to turn off in Windows XP
2008/10/01 13:25:41
-
2008/10/02 09:55:30
-
Change the Windows XP product key
2008/10/01 12:52:20
Most popular tags
What's on?
-
Net Neutrality, Ballmer and bad dress -- Club Builder
Visting Club Builder this week: Steve Ballmer to speak in Australia, local ISPs say Net Neutrality is an American problem and we look at the best dressed from Tech.Ed.

The big problem I see is that I, who run Linux as a home user, and who has some experience with FreeBSD, OpenSolaris and Minix, understand this concept - restricting rights to ordinary users on a "need to know" basis, and granting extraordinary rights on production of superuser authentication - quite well. And this requirement for superuser authentication only turns up when I am doing something with the system. I have no need of it when I am doing things with my own files in my own home directory. I can even get reliable up-to-date system information by giving a full path to a given system administration tool (in the sbin or /usr/sbin directories) without superuser authentication - as long as I am just asking for information, and not intending to change any settings or take any other action.
I have it on good authority - from a computer technician who knows a lot more about MS Windows than I'll ever know - that MS Windows Vista's UAC goes over the top with its queries, and with its demands - what really got his gander was the continual questioning of the superuser/Administrator - while he was working as Administrator.
Of course the Unix security model can do with quite a bit of tweaking, and there are some projects aiming to do just that - but a system that paranoid - why, the next installment will see Vista asking for your password in order to log out - a la some more paranoid manifestations of Multics.